<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:13px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12560"><span id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12561">Dear Fabian,</span></div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12499"><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12556">You will be comfortable using the Cisco ASR 1000 Series routers, which includes the stateful NAT64 technology. </div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12556">In the other hand this mailing list is not appropriate for a quick answer or comment on this issue. Rather move this point to the AFNOG mailing list, this one regroups the operators and ISP engineers who can quickly send some suitable comments or best pratices on NAT64 with Cisco2921. I copied here the afnog mailing list.</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12556"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12557" dir="ltr">Warm regards </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12558">Janvier Ngnoulaye</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12559">Cisco NetAcad Instructor</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_12559">Yaounde - Cameroon</div><br></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_13977" style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 13px;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_13976"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_13975"> <div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_13974"> <font size="2" face="Arial" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_14289"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">De :</span></b> arbogast fabian <arbogast.fabian@aku.edu><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">À :</span></b> "community-discuss@afrinic.net" <community-discuss@afrinic.net> <br> <b id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_14298"><span style="font-weight: bold;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_14297">Envoyé le :</span></b> Vendredi 13 mai 2016 5h52<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Objet :</span></b> [Community-Discuss] NAT64<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1463124502284_14290"><br>Folks…<br><br>We are looking into way we can gradually deploy IPv6 in our network…<br><br>Already we have it running and we have one Test Machine……. The challenge we are facing is that from that machine with IPv6 and from other Machines with IPv4 we can’t communicate in either direction..<br><br>IPv6 Machine just communicate with IPv6 only machines like wise IPv4 Machines just communicate with IPv4 machines ….<br><br>A work around is to do NAT64 between the two subnets….<br><br>It seems the hardware (Cisco 2921 router with IOS Version 15.0) can’t do NAT64……..<br><br>From the internet it seems NAT64 runs on IOS-XE and IOS-CGSE which are Hardware dependent……..seems that we can’t upgrade IOS Version 15.0 to any the two which supports NAT64.<br><br>Before committing any expenses to acquire new router we want to reach out to the community for comments and advises….<br><br>Pls. review and advise.<br><br>Thank you…<br><br><br>--<br><br>Arbogast Fabian,<br>IT Manager,<br>Aga Khan Development Network,<br>Aga Khan University - Tanzania<br>10 Urambo Street – Upanga,<br>P.o Box 125,<br>11102 Dar Es Salaam.<br>Tel:+255-22-2150051<br>Fax:+255-2150875<br>Cell:+255-78-447-8387<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Community-Discuss mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss</a><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>