[afnog] Is this acceptable?

[Kabagambe Kenneth]

> > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> > 186.89.82.166.in-addr.arpa. 255 IN      PTR     AGM.  
> > 
> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> > 89.82.166.in-addr.arpa. 255     IN      NS      ns.vnet.net.
> > 89.82.166.in-addr.arpa. 255     IN      NS      ns2.vnet.net.
> 
> 	It's certainly not an existing FQDN, though it's syntactically
> 	valid, so it depends what you define as acceptable.

I thought acceptable would be something akin to what is in RFC2317.
An example is
193             PTR     host1.C.domain. 

As you stated it isnot a FQDN.


Kenneth

-- 
______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org 
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.


Powered by Outblaze