[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DNS



I read about delegating single IPs in O'Reilly's DNS AND BIND on page 215
and I think with CIDR it can be done.

On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Brian Candler wrote:

> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 12:56:01 +0100
> From: Brian Candler <B.Candler at pobox.com>
> To: ksemat at eahd.or.ug
> Cc: afnog at afnog.org
> Subject: Re: DNS
> 
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 02:09:24PM +0300, ksemat at eahd.or.ug wrote:
> > What I mean't was that initially I wanted my ISP to delegate the reverse
> > zone for my IP to my nameserver that is simply what I meant by being the
> > SOA sorry for putting it out wrongly. I laso wanted it in such a way
> > that if someone wanted 208.132.129.216.in-addr.arpa they would be
> > directed to my server as the server from which to get authoritative
> > answers.
> 
> OK. Well in _principle_ you could be delegated a zone which contains a
> single IP address only; but I've never seen anyone attempt this in practice.
> 
> The next level of delegation is the whole /24, i.e. 129.132.208.in-addr.arpa
> 
> If you have a range of IP addresses, and you want control over the reverse,
> you can get the next level above to pseudo-delegate using CNAMEs (RFC2317)
> 
> 208   CNAME  208.in-addr.eahd.or.ug.
> 209   CNAME  209.in-addr.eahd.or.ug.
> ...
> 
> then you can put in your own forward zone file
> 
> 208.in-addr   PTR   machine1.eahd.or.ug.
> 209.in-addr   PTR   machine1.eahd.or.ug.
> ...
> 
> But you may find it simpler and easier just to get your upstream to handle
> your reverse DNS for you, and make changes when necessary.
> 
> > So otherwise all these errors it is reporting about its files being wrong
> > should I just ignore them?
> 
> You mean with rpm -V? Yes I think so. If you wanted to tidy it you could
> remove both the bind and bind8 packages, then reinstall bind8 by itself.
> 
> I'm coming to the conclusion that there's nothing wrong with bind on your
> machine, it's your machine itself which is sick. If it was my ISP, I would
> rebuild the nameserver onto a fresh PC, running FreeBSD, and have it doing
> nothing else except being a nameserver.
> 
> In fact, I'd build two boxes as caching (only) nameservers, and one or two
> as primary/secondary only (with recursion turned off).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Brian.
> 
> -----
> This is the afnog mailing list, managed by Majordomo 1.94.4
> 
> To send a message to this list, e-mail afnog at afnog.org
> To send a requet to majordomo, e-mail majordomo at afnog.org and put
> your request in the body of the message (i.e use "help" for help)
> 
> This list is mantained by owner-afnog at afnog.org
> 

Sematimba Noah
Network Administrator
Uganda Online
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ksemat at eahd.or.ug P.O.Box 1254 Kampala 



-----
This is the afnog mailing list, managed by Majordomo 1.94.4

To send a message to this list, e-mail afnog at afnog.org
To send a requet to majordomo, e-mail majordomo at afnog.org and put
your request in the body of the message (i.e use "help" for help)

This list is mantained by owner-afnog at afnog.org