[afnog] NAT and Routing Engine on Juniper

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Sep 16 06:58:11 UTC 2014


On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 08:53:06 AM Tarig Yassin 
wrote:

> Thanks Mark
> 
> what bout Cisco 7206 VXR NPE-G1?

Certainly a cheaper (and IMHO, simpler) option if you want 
basic NAT that won't scale beyond a couple of tens of Mbps.

NAT on Juniper's can be pricey if you aren't doing tons of 
bandwidth due to the extra hardware required to do so. Of 
course, current generation platforms such as the MX have in-
built "Services" modules that can offload much (but not all) 
of these additional services. But again, those boxes aren't 
cheap by any means.

You can also consider pfSense. It can carry quite a bit of 
NAT traffic on a decently-spec'ed server.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20140916/494551d0/attachment.sig>


More information about the afnog mailing list