[afnog] [rpd] Re: A typical case of abuse of our resources!!!

[Seun Ojedeji]

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 19 Sep 2014 18:16, "Keshwarsingh Nadan" <keshwarsingh.nadan at millenium.mu>
wrote:

>..... Last year I was about to expose corruption cases regarding IPv4
> allocations during the AOB at the AGM, I was threatened to be killed if
ever
> I would step into Djibouti.
>
Then I would say you may be part of the problem. I don't see why you could
not raise your concern at the AGM, who threatened you? and I hope you have
proof for these allegations.
There are clear guideline to blow a whistle on foul play, and IMO it does
not in anyway help the community neither does it fix anything by saying it
in a manner you have done above.

> This year I'm playing home on my playground, we'll see who can stop me.
> >
Please share the concern and at the same time provide recommendation on
solution. It does not necessarily have to wait for the AGM or home play
immunity ;)

Cheers!

> > Let me summarize Andrew's email again: When a Board begins to reach into
> > operational matters not clearly in its charter or schedule, or not
> specifically
> > assigned by policy, it is recipe for disaster.
> >
> > Sunday.
> >
> > On 19/09/2014 16:21, Omo Oaiya wrote:
> > > On 19 September 2014 14:51, Kofi ANSA AKUFO <kofi.ansa at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Who approved such huge chunk /12 (over a million IPv4 addresses) in a
> > >> first (initial) time request? What does the current policies say
> > >> about such requests? What was the out come of the results of
> > >> hostmasters evaluation? Did hostmasters make any recommendation to
> > >> management?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This connects with the clarity I requested.   Policy seems to be
> > > quite clear to me in AFPUB-2005-v4-001 (8.2 -8.3) but others might
> > > have other interpretation.
> > >
> > > As much as we want different,  Universities and NRENs are being
> > > treated in line with policy.  Why was this allocation treated
> > > differently?  Are there any others getting preferential treatment that
> > > is not guided by "rule of law"?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________ rpd mailing
> > list
> > > rpd at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
> > >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUHFfjAAoJEH6UvSz6fA253IgIAIMJ1rn7D+kRAgOsn90cc5M
> > 2
> > 5uRdrHVT4Dh/v1HcPj0PbYVgzKdLxAj1qsQFeeqXO6Rl2D1XYPQ1vRmtV0W54y
> > eU
> > dmLrXk5xejJhuaNsJYbWRTOjIPzCeHC1N4HcAuBRosRVsbPwfHUwEvymog0g1
> > ZWg
> > uVWnc96i7ck/37+fyjSqwDSoBVDhLRrjzdcSADrGFGfoZHwmfeJJU0Lp1otskBX
> > 7
> > YE99fPs/nzJagRoPPuJbW+xxi/6beKkShu1BOO+Zi6/74NpJN85wWVaXpRdGXJ
> > HW
> > Wt9f7Opb1XvY9kNue73J9P3dXFsUIaNxc0w193U13BptmQ/KeRNGhhxuifqS0
> > OQ=
> > =AnYV
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > _______________________________________________
> > rpd mailing list
> > rpd at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> afnog mailing list
> http://afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20140919/f289c8a8/attachment-0001.html>