[afnog] RPKI
Saul
saul at enetworks.co.za
Fri Jul 31 09:04:42 UTC 2015
Hi Randy,
Thanks.
Just a question (OK, yet another one ;-) )
>ROAs vs ROA records
>I personally think this is bad practice.
>One wants to control each separately.
Are you saying instead of creating one ROA for say 154.72.96.0/20 with a
max length of /24
Rather create multiple ROAs one for the /20 and then individuals?
Thanks
Saul
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at psg.com]
Sent: 31 July 2015 10:25 AM
To: Saul <saul at enetworks.co.za>
Cc: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu>; Nishal Goburdhan
<nishal at controlfreak.co.za>; afnog at afnog.org
Subject: Re: [afnog] RPKI
> So ultimately, how stable/reliable is the RPKI system/policy
implementation?
> Or is the system fine, but AFRNICs systems aren't?
you may find http://archive.psg.com/141006.rpki-nanog.pdf interesting
randy
More information about the afnog
mailing list