[afnog] Decreasing Access Time to Root Servers DNS by Running One on Loopback
Nishal Goburdhan
nishal at controlfreak.co.za
Fri Nov 27 08:14:21 UTC 2015
On 27 Nov 2015, at 9:28, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Needless to say, there is reasonable peering of root name servers
> globally, including within Africa.
yes, but the situation can always be made better. for example, over the
past 18-odd months, there’s been almost a node a month, installed in
this region. but there’s still large parts of africa that’s not
cross-border peered, or don’t have a local DNS root instance, and
still those, who may be reliant on satellite, and fetching this data
from the north. a more distributed root would benefit them.
> I suppose the question is - what is "longer-than-desired round-trip
> times"?
here’s an unscientific set of results, from the name-server at my home
in jnb below. only 10 of these, are what i’d call desirable.
nishal at admin:~ % dig +nssearch . | awk -F ' ' '{print $10, $11, $13}'
server 192.5.5.241 13
server 199.7.83.42 13
server 199.7.91.13 14
server 192.36.148.17 15
server 192.203.230.10 15
server 192.58.128.30 15
server 2001:500:3::42 18
server 2001:7fe::53 19
server 2001:500:2f::f 20
server 2001:500:2d::d 33
server 193.0.14.129 181
server 198.41.0.4 189
server 2001:503:c27::2:30 193
server 192.33.4.12 195
server 2001:503:ba3e::2:30 194
server 2001:500:2::c 199
server 2001:dc3::35 203
server 2001:7fd::1 203
server 192.112.36.4 207
server 202.12.27.33 216
server 128.63.2.53 272
server 2001:500:1::803f:235 291
server 2001:500:84::b 328
server 192.228.79.201 346
—n.
More information about the afnog
mailing list