[afnog] IPv6 transition mechanism used by ISP

[Mark Tinka]

On 3/Dec/18 11:06, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
> I will strongly suggest not going to “only” NAT64/DNS64, but instead
> using 464XLAT, and even not using DNS64 in that case.
>
>  
>
> If you just use NAT64/DNS64, you have the problems you mention when
> some apps use literals, old APIs, etc, and you may break DNSSEC. Those
> problems vanish with 464XLAT.
>

Agreed.

It has been a while since I tested our rig, but back then, 464XLAT
support was very poor, both in phones and CPE.

I haven't checked the current state-of-the-art, if I'm honest. Do you
have a summary of where things are?

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20181203/9ebce05a/attachment.html>