[afnog] Another case for RPKI ?
Frank Habicht
geier at geier.ne.tz
Fri Nov 16 21:14:02 UTC 2018
Hi
On 16/11/2018 23:41, Job Snijders wrote:
> Perhaps we can return to technical discussion, rather than focus on persons.
agreed.
> A few people put together a FAQ on the topic of RPKI in the last few
> days, it is published through the NLNetLabs website:
>
> https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/rpki/faq/
the page says:
> Is it true that BGP4 is just not up to the task any longer?
> Unfortunately it's practically impossible to replace BGP right now, so
> we should fix what is broken.
Also it's very extensible and possibly future solutions can be part of
BGP4 - rather than replacing it.
or something similar, i just thought that answer was too short.
Frank
More information about the afnog
mailing list