[afnog] Another case for RPKI ?
    Frank Habicht 
    geier at geier.ne.tz
       
    Fri Nov 16 21:14:02 UTC 2018
    
    
  
Hi
On 16/11/2018 23:41, Job Snijders wrote:
> Perhaps we can return to technical discussion, rather than focus on persons.
agreed.
> A few people put together a FAQ on the topic of RPKI in the last few
> days, it is published through the NLNetLabs website:
> 
>      https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/rpki/faq/
the page says:
 > Is it true that BGP4 is just not up to the task any longer?
 > Unfortunately it's practically impossible to replace BGP right now, so
 > we should fix what is broken.
Also it's very extensible and possibly future solutions can be part of 
BGP4 - rather than replacing it.
or something similar, i just thought that answer was too short.
Frank
    
    
More information about the afnog
mailing list