[afnog] Is Any BCOP Exists? Please Share your BCP, on Usage of Temporary Resources ! (was: “Clarification on temporary resource usage (staff assessment on v1) - inputs need”)

Sylvain BAYA abscoco at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 20:38:51 UTC 2019


Hi AfNOGers,

I chose to change the subject, of the previous thread, because i
understand the call of Willy as a real mean, occasion, to produce a BCOP
(Best Current Operational Practice) for “Usage of Temporary Resources on
Networks of Technical Event's” or just  “Designing Networks with
Temporary Resources” if not any related BCOP yet exists...

I don't know for you, but IMHO i think, it could be useful to have an
active regional BCOPs Working Group for at least two reasons :

 * RPD activities, as  policy discussions, would be simplified with the
existence of  a local BCOPs repository to bind to ;
 * It's also useful to have documented case studies to build useful BCOP.s

So, you can freely share your experience in this thread, independently
to your contribution on AFRINIC RPD mailinglist as sollicited below.

Perhaps the AFRINIC|African (region-al) BCOPs Task Force, which i think
is still existent, should catch this opportunity for a necessarily
come-back on stage ?

Regards,
--sb.


Le jeudi 11 avril 2019, Willy Manga <mangawilly at gmail.com
<mailto:mangawilly at gmail.com>> a écrit :

    Hello AFNOG community,
    I hope everybody is doing well and is preparing its attendance to
    the next AIS in Uganda be it physically or even remotely ! ;-)

    I need advice/inputs from the organizers of technical event in the
    community on how they can manage IP resources (especially v4) during
    upcoming trainings (2020 and later). Generally IP resources provided
    during these events are assigned by AFRINIC according to section 9.0
    of the Consolidation Policy Manual (CPM). They are called in the
    policy: "temporary resources".

    If you follow RPD list, you may have read this proposal on
    "Clarification on temporary resource usage" [1] . The main purpose
    is to recommend more IPv6 usage and deploy IPv4 at the 'edge' of the
    network.

    I'd like to publish an update to this proposal but it may helpful to
    have more opinions. From AFNOG perspective I'm particularly
    interested on what you think of the section 2.0 b of staff comments
    [2] where they say "could be adversely affected if restricted to use
    the /22 maximum". Can you manage to deal with that and use more v6 ?
    (please say 'yes' :) )

    If you want to provide an input, please do so on the RPD [3] list
    where discussion occurs.

    Thank you in advance. :)

    1. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2018/008958.html
    <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2018/008958.html>

    2. https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009051.html
    <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009051.html>

    3. Do not forget to register first at
    https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
    <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd> in order to be able
    to send emails on this list.

    -- 
    Willy Manga
    @ongolaboy
    https://ongola.blogspot.com/

    _______________________________________________
    afnog mailing list
    https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog
    <https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog>

-- 

Regards,
Sylvain B.
<http://www.chretiennement.org> 
__
Website : <https://www.cmnog.cm>
Wiki : <https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki>
Surveys : <https://survey.cmnog.cm>
Subscribe to Mailing List : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
Mailing List's Archives : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/pipermail/cmnog/>
Last Event's Feed : <https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOGlab3>
<https://twitter.com/cmN0G>
<https://facebook.com/cmNOG>
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/REBOOTcmNOG>
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOG>
<https://cmnog.wordpress.com/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20190413/1a4ebb07/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x0387408365AC8594.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20190413/1a4ebb07/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20190413/1a4ebb07/attachment.sig>


More information about the afnog mailing list