<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><br>thanks Randy and your advise well noted <br><br><br> <br>
<br>
<em><font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#1f497d">Arbogast Fabian,</font></em><br>
<em><font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#1f497d">cell:+255-78-447-8387</font></em><br><br><br><div>> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:41:59 +0200<br>> From: randy@psg.com<br>> To: surfer@mauigateway.com<br>> CC: afnog@afnog.org<br>> Subject: Re: [afnog] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!<br>> <br>> > You should "dual stack" your network and <br>> > the computers will make use of both <br>> > protocols.<br>> <br>> this does not answer the op's question. and dual stack assumes that<br>> you can get as much ipv4 space as needed to number your enture network.<br>> this assumption is no longer safe, at least without significant expense.<br>> <br>> nat64/dns64 at the edge of a v6-only enterprise, or a not too large<br>> v6-only network is the expected solution to this scenario.<br>> <br>> and i suspect that mark tinka will be the best source of info on which<br>> boxes and versions; so i will avoid putting my foot in it. otoh, you<br>> might give somme clue as to how big a 6-only network you want to nat.<br>> <br>> randy<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> afnog mailing list<br>> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog<br></div> </div></body>
</html>