<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0,
0); font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 16px;" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/Aug/16 15:28, Jan Zorz - ISOC
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid #009900 !important;
border-right: 2px solid #009900 !important; padding: 0px 15px 0px
15px; margin: 8px 2px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0) !important; color:
rgb(0, 0, 0) !important; background-color: null !important; color:
null !important;"
cite="mid:5a343a7c-5443-870d-6132-719a0ca85bc8@isoc.org"
type="cite"> <br>
We need somebody with a powerful-enough impact (read: buying
enough CPEs) on CPE vendor(s) to request a CLAT part of 464XLAT
built in CPE. Then you can have IPv6-only "WAN" access and IPv6 +
private_IPv4 addresses on "LAN" side of the router.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
My expectation is that it would just have to be in the code. I'm not
sure it should impact the hardware that much (if at all) on modern
CPE's.<br>
<br>
At any rate, GPON ONU's are an essential requirement in delivery of
FTTH technology over that medium. So vendors would be guaranteed
sales, particularly if they are also supplying the OLT.<br>
<br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid #009900 !important;
border-right: 2px solid #009900 !important; padding: 0px 15px 0px
15px; margin: 8px 2px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0) !important; color:
rgb(0, 0, 0) !important; background-color: null !important; color:
null !important;"
cite="mid:5a343a7c-5443-870d-6132-719a0ca85bc8@isoc.org"
type="cite">
<br>
Other option is MAP-E/T.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
My understanding is that compared to 464XLAT, 6rd and DS-Lite, MAP
is in very short real-life supply.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>