[afnog] privacy vs caching
Alan Barrett
apb at cequrux.com
Mon Dec 22 09:31:33 UTC 2014
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Randy Bush wrote:
> caching is very difficult with end-to-end encryption as the
> cache does not have the private keys of the server. the ietf is
> in a bit of a muddle on this. should one allow middle-boxes to
> break the encryption and fake it?
I would be upset with a connectivity provider who broke
encryption, faked certificates or otherwise interfered with the
end to end model. I go so far as being upset with providers who
redirect TCP port 80 to a "transparent" proxy. If you have a
proxy, then I will be happy to configure it as an upstream for
my browser or for my own proxy, and I'll also be happy if you
announce it in DHCP or other configuration protocols, and I'll be
happy if my browser automatically uses your proxy (provided I can
control whether or not the autoconfiguration method is used), but
I won't be happy if my packet to TCP port 80 up going somewhere
other than the requested destination.
I would like content providers to give me the option of using HTTP
or HTTPS, so that I can make my own tradeoff between cacheability
and privacy. If they want me to view their ads, or contribute
to their page view counters, then I wish they could find a way
to do that my mixing cacheable and non-cacheable content in such
a way that the bulk of the expensive traffic is cacheable, but
they still get their hit counts and per-viewer customised ads via
non-cacheable wrapper pages.
I can imagine mechanisms to allow both cacheing and on-the-wire
encryption, but not end-to-end encryption. I'd be fine with them
too, for some types of content, and with appropriate notification.
> so which is more important to you and your customers (think
> consumers, banks, news sites, ...), end-to-end encryption to
> ensure privacy, or caching to reduce bandwidth consumption and
> improve latency?
For public content, let me make my own choice on a per-website
basis. For content that is customised for me, I prefer privacy to
cacheability.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the afnog
mailing list