[afnog] privacy vs caching

[Seun Ojedeji]

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Sunday Folayan <sfolayan at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Dec 22, 2014 9:15 AM, "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > sent from Google nexus 4
> > kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> >
> > On 22 Dec 2014 08:25, "Johan Bernhardsson" <johan at kafit.se> wrote:
> > >
> > > For Me it is a balance between security and speed and depends on the
> > > customer greatly.
> > >
> > I think this is the main rationale; and the fact that it cannot be 100%
> either way would justify the need to provide option for both ends.
> >
> > I for one will place caching ability above encryption due to my present
> circumstances of limited, but I don't also don't want to believe I am not
> safe by making that decision ;)
> >
> > Cheers!
>
> Do not fake it. You should educate the website architects to Keep http as
> http and HTTPS as HTTPS. You can always cache http but those who really
> want HTTPS should endure the wait. It is worth it.
>
Correct but that is what is the current situation, however i understood
Randy's mail to be asking about the future case scenario where it is only
https and my response was simply saying the future should carry the present
along.

Cheers!

> Randy, BTW, I love this type of questionnaire. Easy to fill.
>
> Sunday.
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20141222/1e2263d5/attachment.html>