[afnog] vpls with LDP juniper
ibtisam jamal
ibty.jamal at gmail.com
Wed Jan 22 14:36:12 UTC 2014
mpls is enabled on the core facing interface and protocol.
Please explain more on this " Assume you have LDP enabled on the
core-facing physical
interfaces as well?"
VPLS with bgp l2vpn signalling works but ldp fails .
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 01:37:27 PM ibtisam jamal
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are trying to configure vpls with ldp for its
> > signalling but its failing to come up.
> > On juniper ,please see the below configs for one end ..We
> > can not see the where the issue is...
> >
> > show configuration routing-instances X200_VPLS
> > description "X2000 vpls";
> > instance-type vpls;
> > interface ge-0/0/0.148;
> > route-distinguisher 10.87.0.2:222;
> > vrf-target target:64514:222;
> > protocols {
> > vpls {
> > vpls-id 2;
> > neighbor 10.87.0.12;
> > }
> > }
>
> For LDP-based VPLS signaling, you don't need to set the RD
> or RT.
>
> > Enabling ldp
> >
> > ldp {
> > interface lo0.0;
> > }
>
> Assume you have LDP enabled on the core-facing physical
> interfaces as well?
>
> Assume you have MPLS enabled on the core-facing physical
> interfaces (both at the [interfaces] and [protocols mpls])
> hierarchies?
>
> Mark.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20140122/f3ee710c/attachment.html>
More information about the afnog
mailing list