[afnog] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!

[Seun Ojedeji]

While dual stacking may not answer his/her question, if the author's reason
for implementing v6 is not because he/she was running out of v4 space then
I'd suggest to go the dual stack route instead.

Overall it all depends on the status of the network so more details may be
helpful.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 13 May 2016 10:43 a.m., "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> > You should "dual stack" your network and
> > the computers will make use of both
> > protocols.
>
> this does not answer the op's question.  and dual stack assumes that
> you can get as much ipv4 space as needed to number your enture network.
> this assumption is no longer safe, at least without significant expense.
>
> nat64/dns64 at the edge of a v6-only enterprise, or a not too large
> v6-only network is the expected solution to this scenario.
>
> and i suspect that mark tinka will be the best source of info on which
> boxes and versions; so i will avoid putting my foot in it.  otoh, you
> might give somme clue as to how big a 6-only network you want to nat.
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> afnog mailing list
> https://www.afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20160513/96477737/attachment.html>