[afnog] Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol implementations may improperly determine LSA recency

[Mark Tinka]

On 29/Jul/17 11:07, Randy Bush wrote:

> we're both being too subtle.  as we teach in the workshops, is-is is not
> subject to local or remote ip attacks for the simple reason it uses a
> non-ip link local protocol, clnp.  it is also simpler and scales far
> better than ospf.
>
> but if you are paid by the hour and like complexity, ospf for the win.

Agreed.

I will always recommend IS-IS. Even to my competitors.

If anyone in our region needs help making the switch to IS-IS, I'm happy
to offer some basic, simple tips.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20170729/c8e96a4c/attachment.html>